Stand with human rights defenders! Uphold justice, freedom, and democracy in the Philippines!

Stand with human rights defenders! Uphold justice, freedom, and democracy in the Philippines!

On the occasion of the 25th year of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, the Center for Women’s Resources (CWR) stands in solidarity with human rights defenders who tirelessly struggle for justice, freedom, and democracy in the Philippines, and across the world. 

In the Philippines, the weaponization of the law against human rights defenders is an affront to our democracy. Activism and other forms of resistance are persistently depicted as threats to national security, or worse, as acts of rebellion. Draconian laws with ambiguous and sweeping definitions, such as the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, have been enacted , empowering authorities to label activists and human rights defenders as terrorists or enemies of the state. 

The Anti-Terror Law has been weaponized by the state against the Filipino people as a tool of fascist terrorism ever since it was put into effect. In recent months, increasing cases of use of ATL or RA 11749 and RA 10168 related to “financing terrorism” have been recorded.  

It is also important to note that many of those charged by ATL, those included in the terrorist list, and those subjected to relentless attacks are human rights defenders who are at the forefront of the fight against neoliberal development and repressive state policies impacting women’s and people’s lives.

From July 2016 to December 2022, there were 66 women victims of extrajudicial killings, many of whom were women human rights defenders – Elisa Badayos, Zara Alvarez, Leonila Pesadilla, and numerous others. These victims include educators, health activists, human rights advocates, and farmers opposing major mining projects destructive in their communities. They tirelessly work to expose the injustices perpetrated by powerful institutions and corporations, and fight for the rights of marginalized communities.

Meanwhile, enforced disappearances remain rampant. On May 3, 2022, Loi Magbanua, a labor organizer and women’s and LGBT rights advocate, was abducted along with a fellow labor organizer. Two months later, peasant organizers and human rights defenders Cha Pampoza and Elgene Mungcal went missing in Moncada, Tarlac.

As of June 2022, there are 162 women political prisoners, including human rights workers Alexandrea Pacalda and Glendhyl Malabanan, development worker Rita Espinoza, writer and women’s rights advocate Adora Faye de Vera, community journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio, and peasant women organizer Amanda Echanis.

Despite relentless attacks, and amid the worsening economic and social crisis, human rights defenders remain committed to holding the state accountable to its people. They stand firm and grounded, even as they face threats to their safety and liberty.

As we commemorate the 25th year of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, let us reaffirm our collective commitment to defend and uphold the rights of those who dedicate their lives to defending the rights of others. Let us remember that the fight for human rights is not limited to a single day or a single declaration, but it is a continuous effort that requires our unwavering commitment and dedication. Together, let’s defend the defenders! Let us strive for a more just, equitable, and democratic future for all Filipinos. ###

Women call out Marcos Jr. admin’s inadequate response to escalating food crisis

Women call out Marcos Jr. admin’s inadequate response to escalating food crisis

The Center for Women’s Resources laments the inadequate response of the Marcos Jr. administration to the ongoing food crisis in the Philippines. Despite being at the helm of the Department of Agriculture, effective solutions to combat the escalating food prices, especially regarding rice, have remained elusive. Instead of implementing concrete measures to strengthen local food production and ensure food security, the government has resorted to short-term, stopgap solutions to address the crisis.

Under Executive Order No. 39, issued by Pres. Marcos Jr., price caps were enforced on regular and well-milled rice starting September 5. The stipulated price limit for regular milled rice is set at PhP41.00 per kilogram, while the ceiling for well-milled rice is PhP45.00 per kilogram.

During the first week of July 2023, the average retail price of a kilogram of well-milled rice stood at PhP45.56 nationwide. In comparison, during the same period last year, the average retail price was PhP43.32. For regular milled rice, over the course of a year, the price has surged from PhP38.99 in 2022 to PhP41.23 in July 2023. Notably, in certain regions like Region VII (Central Visayas), the average retail price can climb even higher, reaching PhP48.25.

The high rice prices disproportionately affect low-income households, as they allocate a more significant portion of their income toward food, especially cereal products like rice. According to the Household Food Consumption Survey conducted by the Food and Nutrition Institute of DOST, low-income households allocate 41.6% of their food expenses to energy-providing foods such as rice and cereals, compared to 28.8% among high-income households.

While the government attempts to stabilize rice prices and make them more accessible to consumers, it is crucial to address the underlying issues plaguing the agricultural sector. These issues include the adverse effects of agricultural liberalization, the lack of robust support for local food producers, and the persistent problem of landlessness.

Passing burden on small retailers

The imposition of price caps on rice does little to address the root causes of the soaring food prices. Price caps may provide temporary relief for consumers by limiting the price they have to pay for rice, but they fail to tackle the issues of supply and demand imbalance, production inefficiencies, and market speculation. 

Another concern is the impact of this policy on small retailers and how it may further burden them without addressing the main issues of supply and demand. Price caps may force small retailers to sell rice at lower prices, potentially leading to reduced profit margins and financial strain. This could result in the closure of small businesses, further concentrating market power in the hands of larger retailers, big importers, and the rice cartel. 

More false solutions

Meanwhile, Marcos Jr. announced his plans to import more agricultural produce this year to address the surge in prices of basic commodities. The government has long pursued a path of agricultural liberalization, which prioritizes rice imports over developing local rice production. This overreliance on imports, reinforced by the enactment of the Rice Liberalization Law in 2019, renders the country vulnerable to fluctuations in global rice prices and undermines the livelihoods of Filipino rice farmers struggling to compete with cheaper, imported rice.

On the other hand, the persistent neglect and lack of support for local food producers, particularly rice farmers, exacerbate the problem. The national budget, for instance, reflects the government’s disregard for the agriculture sector. The proposed budget for the Department of Agriculture for 2024 amounts to PhP 197.84 billion, a 6 percent increase from the 2023 budget allocation of PhP186.54 billion. 

Notably, the biggest share of the budget went to the Office of the Secretary, of which, one-third was allocated for infrastructure development – purportedly to the repair and construction of farm-to-market roads. However, this does not necessarily address the needs of small farmers such as direct subsidies, irrigation, and access to market and resources. 

Another pressing concern is the long-standing issue of landlessness among Filipino farmers. This perpetuates a cycle of poverty and inequality in rural areas, as farmers struggle to make a sustainable income and provide for their families. Seven out of ten farming families still do not own or control the land that they are tilling. Without secure land tenure, farmers are often left vulnerable to exploitation from landlords and agrocorporations. Addressing the issue of landlessness is crucial in ensuring the socio-economic development of Filipino farmers, as well as achieving food security and sustainable development in the country.

The Center for Women’s Resources urges all Filipino people to call for comprehensive and sustainable solutions that prioritize strengthening local food production, supporting small farmers, and addressing the problem of landlessness. #

2 young women activists & environmental defenders latest victims of state terror in Central Luzon

2 young women activists & environmental defenders latest victims of state terror in Central Luzon

The Center for Women’s Resources raises alarm over the recent abduction of human rights and environmental defenders in the Philippines. Last September 2, two community organizers, Jonila Castro, 21, and Jhed Tamano, 22, were abducted by four armed men in Barangay Lati, Orion, Bataan. 

The two young women had been experiencing surveillance and harassment while conducting an investigation in the community regarding the impacts of the Manila Bay reclamation project on fisherfolk’s livelihood and flooding in the area. The two were preparing for relief operations and consultation in communities in Bataan, days before they were abducted. 

At least 23 land reclamation projects have been approved in Manila Bay, an important fishing ground and hub of marine biodiversity in the country. These projects in the provinces of Bataan, Pampanga, Bulacan, and Cavite have caused the displacement of coastal communities, the decline of fish catch, and the deforestation of mangroves, ultimately contributing to the decline in fisherfolk’s livelihood. The permits for the projects were completed under the Duterte Administration between 2019-2022, these builds are linked with Chinese construction company China Communications Construction Co. (CCCC).

While the Marcos administration has ordered an indefinite suspension of 22 major land reclamation projects in Manila Bay, this is not enough to address the long-term impacts of these projects on the livelihood of fisherfolks. It is also crucial to recognize that this suspension was the result of the relentless and persistent advocacy efforts of local rights groups and civil society organizations.

What is also concerning is the surge in acts of violence and aggression targeting community organizers and environmental rights defenders who oppose the reclamation project. The abduction of Castro and Tamano is only the recent spate of these attacks. In October 2019, Cora Agovida, then spokesperson for Gabriela Manila and a campaigner against land reclamation was illegally arrested and detained for two years. Three other anti-land reclamation activists Ram Carlo Bautista, Alma Moran, and Reina Mae Nasino were arrested in November of the same year.

The Center of Women’s Resources joins the families, fellow volunteers, and anti-reclamation groups in demanding the safe return of Jonila and Jhed, in calling to stop attacks against community organizers and rights defenders, and in putting an end to state-sponsored terror. #

Women’s group sounds alarm over lack of transparency in OP budget deliberations

Women’s group sounds alarm over lack of transparency in OP budget deliberations

The Center for Women’s Resources raises alarm over the swift termination of budget deliberations for the Office of the President (OP) amid significant concerns over the misallocation of Filipino taxpayers’ money to bloated confidential and travel funds.

Within ten minutes, the House leadership moved to terminate budget deliberations for the OP purportedly out of “parliamentary courtesy”. Last week, the same was accorded to Vice President Sara Duterte when the budget deliberation was concluded in less than 30 minutes. This long-standing tradition of parliamentary courtesy extended to high-ranking government officials must stop. The practice clearly only favors a few high-ranking individuals over public interest and undermines the principles of transparency, accountability, and responsible fiscal management.  

The President and the House need to be reminded that they bear a solemn responsibility to exercise prudence and transparency when allocating and utilizing Filipino taxpayers’ money and the proposed OP budget does not seem to align with responsible and careful management of financial resources.  

The proposed budget of the OP constitutes 1% of the total FY 2024 NEP. This includes P4.56 billion for Confidential and Intelligence Funds and P1.4 billion for travel expenses. Aside from the requested budget, the OP will be in charge of P733.2 billion worth of Special Purpose Funds whose program allocations are not defined. 

If passed, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. will hold a whopping P739.1 billion worth of Presidential Pork for FY 2024, 42.5% larger than that of 2023. This is bigger than the combined budget of the Department of Health (P199.45 billion), Department of Agriculture (P105.91 billion), and Department of Social Welfare and Development (P209.66 billion). It is concerning how questionable budget proposals, highly susceptible to corruption and wasting of public funds, are easily approved while subsidies and economic assistance to the poor continue to receive a meager portion of the budget. 

The Center for Women’s Resources joins rights groups in scrutinizing the proposed budget of the Office of the President, and in demanding the rightful allocation of public funds for social services and addressing the worsening economic crisis.

##

Solidarity to the Rohingya people!

Solidarity to the Rohingya people!

The Center for Women’s Resources stands in solidarity with the brave Rohingya women and people as we mark the 6th anniversary of the Rohingya genocide. Today, we honor and remember the countless lives lost and the suffering inflicted upon them.

We condemn the atrocities committed against the Rohingya community, particularly women, and demand justice for the grave human rights violations. Our fight for justice is not only a demand but a necessity to ensure accountability for those responsible – the Myanmar military and government.

Beyond seeking justice, we also recognize the urgent need to address the root causes of this systemic violence and persecution. Plunder and extraction of resources played a significant role in violating the rights of the Rohingya people. The richness of natural resources and fertile land of the Rakhine region has attracted economic interests seeking to exploit these resources, including logging, mining, and agriculture companies. We condemn this plunder, extraction, and land grabbing that fuels and perpetuates violence and discrimination. 

Likewise, we urgently demand immediate support for the Rohingya people who continue to endure unbearable conditions within overcrowded refugee camps devoid of basic necessities such as clean water, healthcare, and education. We pledge to stand alongside the Rohingya people, to advocate for their rights – including their right to citizenship, to seek reparation, and ensure their right to safely return to their homeland. 

Finally, we reaffirm our commitment to support all forms of resistance of all the Myanmar people against the military rule and authoritarian regime. The resistance movement in Myanmar represents the struggle of an entire nation, including the Rohingya people, in fighting for justice and democracy. The people of Myanmar deserve to live in a society that upholds their fundamental rights, values their diversity, and promotes peace based on social justice. #